Assess your org's AI competency and close the skill gap

Klara Hermesz

AI Enablement Learning Strategist

You can't close a skills gap you've only ever guessed

As L&D leaders you now carry three jobs: get fluent in AI yourself, upskill the whole org, and rebuild how L&D itself works with it.

Most teams can't define what 'AI fluent' means at any of those levels, so training misses the mark and adoption stalls.

This workshop gives you a framework to diagnose where you and your team actually stand and identify the next step to close it.

What you’ll learn

Stop guessing what "AI fluent" means for your people. Leave with a working diagnostic, a team distribution, and a sequence to close it.

Set it up once in your own account, not a worksheet you'll lose. You leave with it installed and a first diagnostic already run.

Augmentation, Automation, and Agentic: placed separately from work you've actually done. You leave with your grid and a shareable card.

Bottom-heavy, bimodal, augmentation-only, hidden builders. Each implies a different first move. You leave with a filled team snapshot.

One unblock this month, one capability target this quarter, 1-3 champions. You leave with the sequence written and tied to your goal.

Licence tier, data rules, unwritten policy: no training fixes those. You leave with a shortlist of what is genuinely a training problem.

Workshop agenda

Why self-rated AI skills surveys keep telling you the wrong thing
The two-axis framework: three enablement layers, four depth levels, and why people misjudge their own level in both directions. Recap if you caught the lightning lesson; orientation if not.
Install the compass in your own Claude or ChatGPT
Step by step, together, on whichever platform you use.
Place yourself on the grid: the evidence conversation
Run the compass on yourself. It asks what you last actually built, not what level you think you are, and places you separately across the three layers. Ends with your grid and a shareable card.
Breakout: compare grids, and what surprised you
Groups of three. Where did the compass put you that you'd have put yourself somewhere else? Most people find they're deep in one column and empty in another, which is what a map is for.
Sketch your team's distribution, cell by cell
Switch the compass into team mode. A team is a spread, never an average. You'll build a rough count per cell from what you've seen: who uses AI daily, who automated something, who hasn't started.
Build the sequence, and separate skills from access
One unblock this month, one capability target this quarter, one to three champions. Then the honest filter: which gaps are licence tier, data rules or policy, because no training budget fixes those.
Your one next step, and how to run this on someone else
A list of five improvements is a list of zero. You'll commit to one action startable this week, and take the coaching moves for running this on your team without it becoming a review.