Principal Consultant. MD @ Datawhistl

📉 Most production deployments underperform or fail — Gartner expects over 40% of agentic AI projects to be cancelled by 2027. The velocity that Claude Code and Cursor give developers in the sandbox quietly hides architectural debt that production exposes the moment the agent meets real customers, real data, and real regulators. The cause is rarely the LLM call — it's the workflow architecture around it.
🏛️ Frameworks like AWS's Well-Architected Generative AI Lens stop at defining best practices but completely lack the specificity required to prevent production failures.
⚖️ Governance standards like AIGP focus on control rather than engineering patterns and lack practical actionability for the engineering team.
This workshop closes that gap.
Using real case studies, you'll learn how to identify and apply AI architecture principles to design agents that survive contact with reality — real customers, real data, and real regulators. And do so in a repeatable, auditable manner across your entire Agentic AI project portfolio.
From flaky sandbox demos to consistent business value. Proven, structured techniques to architect agentic AI systems in production.
Three real production failures — multi-channel retail, property & life insurance, and automotive. Not toy demos, not hypotheticals.
For each: what the system was meant to do, where the architecture missed, and why the model itself was never the root cause.
Then the counterfactual — which principles, applied at design time, would have caught the failure before it shipped.
A principle is a guideline at its core — a rule, not an implementation. What makes it enforceable is the scaffolding built around it.
That scaffolding — rubric, gates, evidence requirements, reference implementation — is what an ARB and a CI pipeline can actually act on.
The workshop covers that anatomy and how to apply it in planning, design reviews, and engineering — for RAG, prompts, evals, and agents.
Building a principles catalogue from scratch is an 18-month detour. Standing on AWS GenAI Lens gives you a credible spine on day one.
Each principle is written platform-agnostic — the same spec ships on AWS, Azure, GCP, or self-hosted. Lens is the anchor, not the cage.
Each principle adds the specificity Lens stops short of — concrete spec, rubric, gates — so reviewers can actually decide pass/fail.
Architecture Review Board process — a gated design review that uses the rubric to score a design before any code is written.
Automated gates at the code layer — pre-commit hooks, CI/CD checks, and AI-based code scanners flag principle violations before merge.
A decision framework for sequencing principle adoption — failure-mode mapping, regulatory must-haves, and an effort × impact lens.
Define failure first. Project-level vs. enterprise-level views, then four buckets that cover the space between. Five real production implementations follow, each mapped to a different failure type.
The work already done. WAF, GenAI Lens, ML Lens, Responsible AI Lens — what each covers, what they don't, and why your data, regulator, and risk model force you to extend rather than adopt as-is.
A principle remains a guideline until it has scaffolding. Walk a sample schema field by field — statement, problem, solution, gates, evidence, RI — so you see what an ARB actually reviews against.
Applicability + maturity_level + criticality applied to your workload. Tier isn't a property of the principle — it's a sequencing call shaped by your system, regulator, and risk profile.
The principle nobody owns is the principle nobody enforces. Criteria for each call — when central platform owns the implementation, when the project team does, and the evidence handoff between them.
Hands-on, in cohort. Pick one principle, walk it from best-practice statement to production-ready RI — spec, rubric, gates, evidence requirements. Leave with an artifact your team can review next week

Ex-IBM, TCS, Wipro Consultant. | 25+ Years Scaling Data, AI & MarTech Solutions
Senior Developers who are responsible for building production-grade Agentic AI workflows.
AI Governance & Risk Professionals translating governance policy into architecture decisions that engineers can actually build against.
Business Heads/Project Managers accountable for AI initiatives and who need to understand architecture challenges without getting into code.

Live sessions
Learn directly from Dheeraj Saxena in a real-time, interactive format.
Lifetime access
Go back to course content and recordings whenever you need to.
Community of peers
Stay accountable and share insights with like-minded professionals.
Certificate of completion
Share your new skills with your employer or on LinkedIn.
Maven Guarantee
Your purchase is backed by the Maven Guarantee.
Maven for Teams
Reimbursement
Get your company to pay
Everything L&D needs: email template, receipts, and certificate of completion.
Get reimbursedTeam discount
Learn with your teammates
Save 20%+ when 2 or more teammates enroll in the same cohort.
Save 20%+ with a teamPrivate cohort
Run a cohort for your org
A dedicated cohort with a custom schedule and curriculum, tailored to your team.
Book a private cohort$499
USD
3 cohorts